Posted by Steven on November 15, 1999 at 12:41:59:
In Reply to: Re: UNFAIR posted by john on November 14, 1999 at 22:34:28:
: There seems to be alot of suspicion and accusation stirring around the board. Everyone has been taking things in the worst possible intent. While Bill's post was possibly misinterpreted, what he said was no worse than what Steve said to Wondereal with all the exclamations and capitals. Honestly does it really matter if they delete the clutter of a long original post to make a clearer statement when the thread is clearly visible in the formating of the titles? Many people on this board do so, Bill was one in this thread. But more importantly why do we always assume that there is some rude, or angry meaning behind posts when they could be interpreted in several ways?
: Perhaps we should all think first about our perception of what we read before we jump to a conclusion.
Perhaps we should.
So have you at least applied your exhortation to yourself?
My post ("with all the exclamations and capitals"), to which you referred, was this:
: : : : : : WHAT is beautifully written????
: : : : : : You shouldn't delete the former post(s) you are referring to! It's confusing!
Do you really think this is offensive? I don't. I am simply attempting to explain my point in the most concise manner possible, without any abusive implications of any kind.
I'll try again:
Why can't a person who is DIRECTLY referring to some post at least leave the single post to which he or she is directly referring? This is logical, and it adds clarity. If you choose to delete the rest of the string, that's just fine with me.