Posted by giveawayboy on January 13, 2003 at 23:52:09:
In Reply to: Image of God (notes) posted by jason on January 13, 2003 at 13:15:36:
: : Three different patterns to look at the Image of God and how it is manifested in us... : > Substantive - The image of God is some inherent "awesomeness" : ** "Substantive" defined: : > Relational - The image exists completely within the experience of the relationship. : > Functional - The image of God exists in you only through the things that you do. : J Man Jason, these notes are good. Here is just my own rambling. As Paul says, this is me speaking, not the Lord. I think that man is GOOD but fallen, so I believe that all his GOOD is tainted. I do not believe babies are born untainted. Still, I do not believe they are born as culpable as someone who committed actual sins. I believe that man is born under original sin. I do not believe that man can contribute anything toward his salvation apart from God, but I believe God has given man abilities to reason, esp. enlightened by his Spirit, which can point him to a knowledge of God and a desire to unite w God. I believe any pre-salvific work in a man's life is the workings of God's grace. I believe the whole process of redemption is God's grace working through love. I believe faith is a gift. I believe knowledge of God comes from God. I believe our wills come to us from God. I believe that it's all basically God, but I believe it's imperative that we cooperate. Still, it's a cooperation that ultimately loses us in God. It is not about us, it is about God. I believe that the image of God is par excellence, Christ, who is substance and demonstrates relational and functional elements, but is not merely relational or merely functional. I believe that the image of God in us is a mystery which echoes the name of our creator. I believe it is a mysterious stamp on us that rises up out of creation and says something unique about the creator. I do not think this makes us better than animals or plants or minerals or what not. I don't view it as competitive. I think the manness of man is a testimony to the plantness of plants, or the rockness of rocks, etc. I think the manness of man points to the godness of man and the godness of plants and rocks, etc. I think that the manness of man points to the godness of man and ultimately to God as the creator of all. man, being fallen, needs to be reunited w god, this is what christ, the godman does. he is the way back to our unbent manness. hey, this is real strange. dont anyone build a religion on it. still, i think the image of god is substance. i think christ in us is the hope of glory. later, Bill
: - Concept introduced by John Lee's discussion regarding the Biblical "seed of faith."
: - Introduced by Nancy Fairchild.
: - We are born with "awesomeness" in us, but it is waiting for God's action
: to make it manifest. (Armenian view simplified)
: - We are born with no inherent goodness (perhaps a structure that could
: somehow be traced back, like a woman born with a special gift of love is
: twisted into prostitution), and the awesomeness exists ONLY by the
: pure grace of God. (Calvinistic view simplified)
: 1. Betokening or expressing existence (the verb "to be")
: 2. Depending on itself; independent.
: "He considered how sufficient and substative this land was to maintain
: itself without any aid of the foreigner." - Bacon
: 3. Enduring; Solid; firm; substantial.
: "Strenght and magnitude are qualities which impress the imagination in
: a pwerfule and substative manner." - Hazlitt
: 4. Pertaining to, or constituting, the essential part or principles; as,
: the law, substantive.
: - Presented as spiritual "antennae" or receptors by Mike Cleary.
: - "Spiritual Existentialism" - Meigs
: - Introduced by Steve Meigs.
: - Actions such as feeding the poor.
: - What happens when we die? Does the image of God exist when we pat angels
: on the back? (Simplified)