Posted by PS on October 21, 2003 at 19:04:37:
In Reply to: suckstance revisited posted by mister metal on October 21, 2003 at 10:02:27:
*** This post deleted. Evil Steven has been exorcised, complete with writhing, foaming, and one brutal final convulsion accompanied by blood-curdling scream. It was cool.
*** Just please be nice to mothers (parents) who choose alternative Halloween activities for their kids. They might be really doing what they feel is right out of sincere motivations of love. It is possible. It might not be legalism on their part.
*** If it is legalism, it is the church's fear-based teachings on Halloween that promote it. This is the church's suckteriology, and it is suckstantially flawed, but the parents who are trusting their suckterian leaders are just trying to avoid suckrilege, embrace Christian sucksiety, and suckcede in raising good kids.
*** No doubt someone will punish me by adding to this suckening suckcession.
: who mentioned the church and its flaws?
That would be Pastor Jeff in a post yesterday, where he blasted the church. Here's the link:
PJ's post
: i surely did not.
We know. Jeff did. It was cool. So?
: i did not mention anything to be legalistic but alas this post will probly be deleted as well. i don't think i will be heard but in all honesty i was not tryin to judge..kat,bill,steve and others i hope you see that.
: and if you don't..god knows my heart..and thats all that matters.
The whole "suckstance" paragraph was a joke. Perhaps you noticed the many puns of the word "suck" in it? This should clue you that it is all tongue in cheek. I made it even clearer by adding: "No doubt someone will punish me by adding to this suckening suckcession," meaning that undoubtedly others would add to the puns. Bill got it. That why Bill responded with more suck puns. Kat got it. She responded with more puns also. Sheesh, man, lighten up...